JAN 2022 - APR 2022

SWIFT TIX is a Figma mockup for a ticket sales website. It focuses specifically on music events rather than all live events, offering concert & festival tickets to fans who are tired of the resellers, scalpers, and bots that make it impossible for them to see the artists they love at affordable prices. The concept stemmed from a prompt provided by Google as part of their UX Design Certificate program.

OVERVIEW

This was the second project I created as part of my UX Portfolio, and my first time designing a responsive e-commerce website. To starkly contrast designs of similar services like Ticketmaster and Stubhub, I chose rich colors, bold images, and unique layouts to craft a bespoke experience for passionate music fans.

THE PROBLEM

Bots and resellers looking to make profits are able to buy all the tickets to an event in a matter of minutes, which leaves the majority of (human) fans left out of enjoying their favorite artists.

THE GOAL

Design a website that lets venues and musicians sell their tickets directly to real humans, with protections against scalping and price gouging, so consumers can safely and comfortably purchase the tickets they like.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. TRY IT FOR YOURSELF
  2. USER RESEARCH
  3. COMPETITIVE AUDIT
  4. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
  5. USABILITY STUDY
  6. ASSORTED FINAL MOCKUPS
  7. CONCLUSION
NOTE FOR DESKTOP USERS

Once the page finishes loading, you can navigate with the number keys. 0 = top, 1-7 = Table of Contents, 8 = Downloads, and 9 = bottom.

Move to the next or previous section with the + and - keys.

THE PROBLEM

Bots and resellers looking to make profits are able to buy all the tickets to an event in a matter of minutes, which leaves the majority of (human) fans left out of enjoying their favorite artists.

THE GOAL

Design a website that lets venues and musicians sell their tickets directly to real humans, with protections against scalping and price gouging, so consumers can safely and comfortably purchase the tickets they like.
-1-
TRY IT FOR YOURSELF!
Playing around with the prototype requires a wider device.

Try visiting this page on your desktop, laptop, or tablet!
INSTRUCTIONS: For a complete user flow, scroll down the home page and click on the explore button under the binoculars. Then click on Kanye West to go to his artist page, and click the top tour date for Wells Fargo Center to complete a ticket sales transaction.

This project required me to also design a mobile version of the website to learn more about responsive web design. The mobile prototype is limited, but you can try it out below. The desktop prototype has much more detail and includes more of the features that users expect when using an industry standard digital shopping platform.
NOTES:

- It may take a little bit for the images & icons to load, especially any images of artists.
- If you ever get lost, click anywhere on the screen. The blue boxes represent things you can interact with.
- Kanye West has the only fully interactive artist page, meant to be a demo of the different features available for every artist. The other artist pages are static mockups meant to showcase the individuality brought to each artist's design.
- Drake has the only fully interactive ticket section out of the 4 artists shown on the homepage, meant to be a demo of the different actions available for any ticket section. One exception to this is clicking on the venue to show tickets for different sections, which is a common feature on other ticket sales websites and could easily be included in a real working version of this mockup. Clicking on the venue on Drake’s page simply shows a reloading screen, and does nothing when clicked on any other ticket section (except the overlay for Kanye’s page from the main user flow).
- The mobile prototype has no functionality aside from the main user flow of purchasing a ticket. It is meant to simply demonstrate how core parts of the website would translate over to a mobile device.
- Only the first result on the Festivals & Pre-Sale screens for the mobile prototype work, so you have an idea of the mobile look for those previews.
- For the best view, open the prototype in full screen and select either “Fit to screen” or “Actual size (100%)”
- For the best performance, I recommend turning on GPU acceleration in your browser.
-2-
USER RESEARCH

There were 10 initial interviews conducted with participants who mentioned an active interest in music. The following set of 6 questions was asked to each participant:

Do you go out to a lot of concerts?
Is there a must-see artist for you to see if they are touring?
Are you able to buy/afford the tickets you want?
When was the last concert you went to?
What's a dealbreaker for you when looking for the perfect ticket?
Do you have a go-to place for buying concert tickets?

This allowed me to pinpoint 3 pain points.

COST
It’s hard to buy concert tickets at a reasonable price, let alone retail. With prices regularly in the hundreds BEFORE fees, this shuts out most of the artist’s audience.
ACCESS
Most people can’t and have no interest in coding a bot or paying a scalper to get tickets for them. There’s pre-sale sign ups & email notifications, but limited initiatives don’t reward diligent fans.
OPPORTUNITY
Current platforms add on exorbitant convenience fees and the resale market is unpredictable. Buyers are forced to foot the bill while resellers & scalpers get away scot free.

From the interviews and pain points, I was able to paint a clearer picture of my audience through this persona.

CORY is a student and avid music fan who needs a ticket sales platform that favors humans because he can’t afford the prices to see his favorite artists live.
Age
19
Location
GA
Education
BA
Career
Marketing
Age
19
Location
GA
Education
BA
Career
Marketing

Cory is a 19 year old marketing student and part-time barista who lives in the city of Atlanta, Georgia. He is very passionate about his favorite artists, shares his hot takes on music Twitter, and would much rather be at a concert than a college party.

Cory is frustrated that he misses most of the concerts he'd like to go to because tickets are bought and resold so quickly that it’s very difficult for him to find concert tickets at retail price. They feel impossible to obtain because more often than not finding a ticket that’s priced fairly comes down to luck, a problem which is poorly accounted for by the user experience of these ticket sales platforms.

ASPIRATIONS

  • Find a checkout process that's fast and simple, so he has a chance to obtain tickets before they sell out.
  • Earn rewards for being a diligent music fan.
  • Have access to the same streamlined purchasing process across devices.

FRUSTRATIONS

  • "These resale prices are just TOO expensive. I don't have the money for that!"
  • "I feel like special discounts or perks would be cool for hardcore fans."
  • "If I'm not near a computer or laptop, I still want a fair shot at landing a ticket."
"pretty wild how young ppl decide what music gets popular but there's barely any tickets we can afford to see our favorite artists"
- Cory @cory1nthahouse

PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

My user persona helped me visualize who this website would be for - the young, diehard, passionate music fans who are the main demographic responsible for their favorite artists' success, but are financially boxed out of enjoying the complete experience. In order to empower and help this target group, two major targets would need to be addressed:

Venues and festivals who form the primary ticket sales market
Resellers who form the secondary market
With that, the goal statement for this project was clearly defined:
"SWIFT TIX will enable users to comfortably and securely purchase concert tickets at affordable prices, which will curb unhinged opportunism from sellers while still allowing them to sell freely and directly to fans, and empower buyers by helping them connect more deeply to the artists they love."
-3-
COMPETITIVE AUDIT
The following 2 sections detail the findings of a competitive audit conducted on my competitors. You can view each individual audit for Ticket Master and Stubhub.

Below you'll find both audits available on Figma for interactive browsing - or if you just want the TL;DR, click here to skip to the summary.
Browsing interactively requires a wider device. Try visiting this page on your desktop, laptop, or tablet!
TICKETMASTER
"Working with our partners to envision the future of live entertainment is what drives our team. Building the technology and service to seamlessly connect fans with the events they love is our passion. We are relentless in our pursuit to develop the innovations that will unlock unforgettable experiences for fans."

Statistics

Total visits over past 3 months
Averaging 120 million visitors over the past 3 months
Average visit duration
Average visit duration: 4 minutes and 1 second (04:01)
Trustpilot reviews
3.4 stars on Trustpilot
Top 3 countries that make up web traffic
Top 3 countries: US (86.1%), Canada (4.4%), and UK (2.0%)
Main demographics of users
Biggest demographics: 25-34 (28.5%) and 18-24 (21.7%)

Points of Interest

Face Value Ticket Exchange

An artist-driven marketplace where fans can sell their tickets to other fans at face value. Ticketmaster’s Face Value Ticket Exchange is free to use for buyers and sellers.

SafeTix™

SafeTix feature encrypted, changing barcodes and “tap and go” NFC technology, which prevents tickets from being screenshotted or photocopied, virtually eliminating fraud and counterfeiting.

Smart Queue™

Instead of a rush to the onsale that favors the bots, Smart Queue drops fans into a virtual queue requiring each user to sign in and provide a unique phone number for validation.

UX Insights

Click an image to learn more. Click again to go back.

Features

+
  • Smart Queues which curb bots by requiring sign-in and verification before purchase
  • Ticketmaster Request lets users skip queues and request tickets ahead of time
  • SafeTix uses "encrypted, changing barcodes" to prevent screenshotted or photocopied tickets and fight fraud
  • Ticket insurance with covers sale price, fees, and even other expenses like parking, up to $10,000
  • Paperless since 2008

Accessibility

+
  • Nice big centered call to action on homepage for searching and finding tickets
  • Dedicated FAQ section for information on purchasing accessible seating
  • Navbar provides constant access to essential features
  • Multiple ways to reach help section
-
  • At 100% zoom must body text is pretty small
  • Sign-in popup on mobile continually appears despite closing
  • Prices not localized (USD only, or CAD for Canada)
  • Sitemap missing on mobile website
  • Back button doesn't work when on seat selection because it is opened in a new tab
  • Poor space distribution on mobile between venue diagram and ticket selection

User Flow

+
  • Allows sorting by price or best seating
  • Can filter out resale tickets
  • Seating chart allows zooming in per stadium section for detailed seat selection
  • Allows viewing prices with fees added in
-
  • Seating chart does not scale well on mobile devices
  • Site is laggy and slow, resulting in botched transactions for buyers AND sellers
  • Individual seats are small and difficult to click or select, and are not shown on mobile!
  • Zooming in and out of seating chart is slow, and mouse wheel is even slower
  • Doesn't automatically show you prices with fees included

Analysis

What can be said about Ticketmaster that hasn't been said before? They are the antithesis of what Swift Tix is trying to be.

In addition the substandard UX detailed above, Ticketmaster is a corrupt monopoly that takes advantage of the fact that, as far as most people are concerned or aware of, they are the only option for purchasing tickets to their desired events. Yet most users, especially those on the short end of the stick, are intimately aware of their practices.

In recent years, undercover investigations have confirmed much of the public's suspicions regarding Ticketmaster. In stark contrast to when their former CEO Irving Azoff said scalping and reselling should be "illegal", they have begun to prefer these markets over the general public onsale market of everyday ticket buyers. Core features like the controversial, well known "Dynamic Platinum Tickets" take advantage of the innate volatility of general onsale allowing customers to pay completely different prices for the same seats and shows! Ticketmaster has no buyer protections- not even vetting listings or event details, and the price you see and click on isn't even guaranteed to be the final price you pay (before fees of course). This is directly from their purchase policy:
TicketMaster terms of service describing lack of price guarantee
The biggest smoking gun of all is an undercover investigation conducted by CBC, which uncovered how Ticketmaster actually forms relationships with top resellers and scalpers, turns a blind eye to their practices and numbers even if it violates the terms of service, and provides them with TradeDesk, an invite-only inventory management system that allows scalpers to buy, list, and manipulate the prices of large quantities of tickets! This site is mentioned nowhere at all on their website, even under the Reselling FAQ section, and it violates their own statement to CBC where they say, "We also do not determine when tickets are available for purchase or how they are allocated."

More interesting details have been put out in a claim filed by ticket brokerage Prestige Entertainment, who uses bots to scalp tickets but claims to have the aid of Ticketmaster. This section succinctly explains how TicketMasters abuses this conflict of interest for their own benefit:
"When TM sells a ticket to a reseller, it not only collects the full commission from that primary sale, but it has a significantly higher chance of that ticket being placed on one of its secondary ticket exchanges — after all, resale is what resellers do. TM then receives a second, ‘double-dip’ commission on the resale of that ticket. TM’s ticket listings for popular shows are often dominated by tickets on its resale exchange — tickets which originally came from its primary exchange and thus for which it is getting double-dip commissions."
They maintain a monopoly, take advantage of consumer trust, and are the chief reason why so many genuinely passionate and excited music fans can't go to their desired shows. There is a lot to learn from here that Swift Tix aims to get right - the UX side of it is just the tip of the iceberg, because at the end of the day, the user experience of a ticket sales website doesn't end until you walk through the doors of the venue.
STUBHUB
"For over 20 years, StubHub has been the leading marketplace for fans to buy and sell tickets. Today, we continue to offer you peace of mind with our exclusive FanProtect Guarantee, best-in-class customer service and product features that ensure we have your back."

Statistics

Total visits over past 3 months
Averaging 24 million visitors over the past 3 months
Average visit duration
Average visit duration: 3 minutes and 43 seconds (03:43)
Trustpilot reviews
1.3 stars on Trustpilot
Top 3 countries that make up web traffic
Top 3 countries: USA (94.4%), CAN (1.9%), ARG (0.4%)
Main demographics of users
Biggest demographics: 25-34 (27.1%) and 18-24 (19.5%)

Points of Interest

FanProtect

StubHub’s exclusive FanProtect Guarantee ensures valid tickets or your money back. It also provides payment assurances and protections for sellers.

Community Forums

The Community is an active and collaborative place to learn more about events and ask questions to fellow fans!

Stubhub Beyond

Loyalty perks and rewards for the biggest fans of all, featuring benefits like invitations to VIP parties, meet 'n' greets, access to select promotions!

UX Insights

Click an image to learn more. Click again to go back.

Features

+
  • Secondary ticket sales market
  • Affiliate program
  • Long list of partners
-
  • Stubhub Beyond is only available for users who spend $30,000+ in a year...

Accessibility

+
  • All pages are neatly divided into appropriate sections
  • Website makes good use of mobile space
  • Zooming and scrolling seating chart is much easier than Ticketmaster
-
  • Text is too small
  • FAQs are convoluted and maze like
  • Detailed filters are only available on desktop

User Flow

+
  • Checkout has good ticket preview image
  • Progress bar for completing purchase
  • Solid amount of filters for tickets
-
  • Constant time remaining popups if you leave the purchase window
  • Tickets aren't received? You get a mobile transfer option for most events, which means you only get the tickets the day of the event. For original sale tickets that might be okay but for resale, not at all.
  • Can't filter for unrestricted view or seated vs standing seats

Analysis

Stubhub seems like your usual run of the mill secondary market for ticket sales. The site is good enough, the UX is bland but serviceable, and the crux of their point of difference - the FanProtect guarantee - is a common sense promise to their customers that states the following:
Where Stubhub falls short however is actually abiding by those promises. Out of all the companies I audited for my UX projects, they have the lowest consumer trust by a wide margin - over 100 pages of fed up, frustrated, indignant customers detailing a litany of complaints like never receiving their tickets, purchasing unvetted, fraudulent, illegitimate tickets, lack of or poor response from customer service, stiffing and delaying payouts to resellers, and confirming purchases before verifying whether the tickets are available! Just all around unacceptable behavior for a company that advertises themselves as the leading secondary market place for resellers.

Ticketmaster enables and turns a blind eye to fraud, but Stubhub actively engages in these practices themselves. They violate the "guarantee" they claim to provide above, and abuse consumer trust. This further disenfranchises music fans because now if they miss the initial onsale and want to try their hand at the secondary market, there are no precautions to protect them from getting burned, or help them if they are!

Because Stubhub makes no effort to innovate or curb the issues with its business model, this means that buying on Stubhub is closer to the Wild West instead of the secure, seamless experience fans deserve. As a ticket sales exchange, it's totally inexcusable to be this bad at the "sales" part.
AUDIT SUMMARY
Despite the presence of other players in the ticket sales market, Ticketmaster and Stubhub were chosen for this competitive audit because of their name brand recognition, indisputable numbers, and rightful claims for being the #1 ticket sales and resale marketplaces respectively. From a cursory glance, their sheer domination and chokehold of the industry (read: monopoly) makes it seem impossible for a newcomer platform like Swift Tix to thrive and carve a lane in the area, but as they say, looks can be very deceiving.

The reason why Swift Tix has a chance against these platforms is because they either actively engage in or passively allow practices that diminish and outright violate their core product offering. Let's briefly discuss why for each platform.

Ticketmaster offers a sTradeDesk for its most successful resellers that lets them buy and sell as they please with 0 penalties. A CBC investigation that went undercover during Ticket Summit 2018 uncovered that not only does this platform allow scalpers to heavily influence the ticket prices on the main site, but Ticketmaster's resale abuse department turn a blind eye to all activities from sellers that use TradeDesk. An employee even unknowingly confesses while addressing the crowd at the investigation that "we're not trying to build a better mouse trap." That one sentence basically tells you everything you need to know. But the infighting between Ticketmaster and scalping groups has unveiled even more dubious practices detailed in a counterclaim against Ticketmaster that you can view here.

There are no real or alleged claims of Stubhub controlling its market prices, but they provide such a poor all round experience that everything from their Trustpilot page to their own community forums are RIDDLED with complaints of poor/rude customer service, refusing refunds despite valid circumstances, not verifying the tickets they sell, failing to provide tickets after users have already paid, and piling on fees and extra charges that add up to laughable checkout totals. There is no culture of buyer safety or protocols for protecting fans; instead, they have cultivated a secondary market that is determined by the luck of the draw, and an overwhelming number of fans come up short as a result of this poor user experience decision.

Yet Ticketmaster and Stubhub thrive despite this because as mentioned earlier, they are the sole option that most people have for purchasing any kind of event tickets, let alone concerts. But with public opinion largely against them and rotten business practices that expose cracks in the foundation of their business model, there are 2 major opportunities here for Swift Tix to pursue for success:
OPPORTUNITYFans want to purchase fairly priced and thoroughly vetted tickets in a seamless and secure fashion.
USER EXPERIENCE GAP
GAP
Ticketmaster allows price gouging and may (allegedly) participate in it itself.
Stubhub does not confirm that tickets are legitimate before purchase.
Both platforms tack on lots of fees.
USER EXPERIENCE SOLUTION
SOLUTIONSwift Tix will minimize its commission, prevent illegitimate listings, and actively develop measures that ensure humans, rather than bots, are the core userbase.
Live music events sell themselves - the user already comes to your site planning to spend money, so music fan focused features with no tolerance fraud policies and minimal fees will generate consistent long term revenue, encourage repeat business, and maximize user satisfaction.
OPPORTUNITY
Whether it's an emergency or a simple desire to make a profit, sellers need to have a fair stake too.
USER EXPERIENCE GAP
GAPTicketmaster and Stubhub both skew operations in a way that favors the highest sellers on their platform, but the rest don't receive the same treatment.
USER EXPERIENCE SOLUTION
SOLUTIONSwift Tix will hold all legitimate sellers to the same standard, allow profits to be made in a fair way, and ensure certain rights to sellers like it does to buyers.
A comfortable environment for buyers and sellers with no preferential treatment for either is Swift Tix's main goal. This means that users can always sell and fully control the price of their ticket, should the corresponding event allow it, payouts should be fast, and small unintrusive ways to expand business. Customer support needs to be swift with responses- even if a solution isn't possible right away they need to engage. And if a ticket cannot be verified, it will not be sold!
-4-
INFORMATION
ARCHITECTURE
The key foundation for Swift Tix to be successful was determined to be a mix of these three qualities: immersive, secure, and smooth. These were the three criteria that all design decisions had to meet.

Note: Accessibility is a requirement for all 21st century design projects. That is - it's an implicit guide that must be satisfied in each step of the process.

Feel free to click any of the images below to view at full size.

Site Map

ORANGE indicates a link to a new page. PURPLE indicates a link to a new page that is also the child of another page.

Buyer Flow

Simplification and streamlining of the checkout process was a primary objective, followed by interconnectivity between the various modes of event discovery.

Seller Flow

Yup, this isn't an exaggeration or anything, selling is this simple on Swift Tix. Mainly because you can only sell tickets you've bought on the site, which adds an innate layer of security and confidence to all transactions since the primary market is always thoroughly vetted and legitimate!

It also saves you time with listing details - just enter the price you want to sell at and you're good to go!

Low Fidelity Wireframes

If you’ve used one of the prototypes or skipped down to the final mockups, you might be scratching your head at how different these look. Truth be told, my first design ideas were pretty barebones and didn’t become more creative until I picked apart the websites of my competitors.

HOME PAGE

My initial design included a static navigation bar and was more influenced by shopping sites like Grailed rather than Live Nation. Compact squares that showed the location, artist image, artist name, and price range of available tickets seemed like a quick, efficient way for the user to get a good summary of relevant information.

PRE-SALE

One of the items on the navigation bar was a COMING UP section that made browsing & joining upcoming ticket pre-sales a simple one click process. I organized under one tab and provided each with a PRE-SAVE button. I realized a showy design could only work by minimizing the actions to get from A to B.
This is the original concept for browsing listings on mobile. Similar to the above, very bare bones and ultimately felt too much like a mundane reconstruction of the designs of my competitors. This concept felt forced - it wasn't friendly and crammed the screen.
Stubs was the part of the user's account that held purchased tickets. It seemed obvious on mobile devices to make the ticket take up the length of the screen. Playing with size this way was one good step in the right direction that helped me later on.

High Fidelity Wireframes

My dissatisfaction with the low fidelity wireframes made me go back to the drawing board completely. I thought about the audience described in the user persona - this was a site for music lovers. And being a music lover myself, I started to think about how the information architecture could speak to fans the same way good music does.

I began by retooling the home page with useful, focused sections that were expanded to full pages if necessary. This helped me form a much more practical site map than I had originally designed, while still allowing me to be creative. Click to enlarge the images.
  1. The RECOMMENDED FOR YOU section shows musicians you might like based on your concert history in a playful bubble layout, with additional details available upon hover like rating, genre, number of shows & tickets, and even a blurb for some of the bigger artists.
  2. The ALL GENRES section shows artists performing near you based on the genre icon that you click. You can then directly go to any of the artist’s landing pages via clicking on them.
  3. The PRE-SALE section is a preview of the PRE-SALE page. It’s a slideshow that shows some of the popular pre-sale events available for signup. Clicking the “Sign Up” button (not functional in this prototype) would let you begin the sign up user flow on the spot, or you can click the image itself to visit that event’s section on the PRE-SALE page.
  4. The FESTIVALS section is a preview of the FESTIVALS page. It shows the 4 biggest festivals happening near you, and hovering over one of the panels reveals some standouts among the setlist to pique your interest.
The original “home” page was refactored into an appropriate SEARCH page because I decided that each artist should have their own personally designed landing page. This ARTIST page provides all the musician related information and actions a user would need in a sleek, accessible fashion:
This section near the top is what I like to call the MARQUEE SECTION. It’s another slideshow type component but it’s reserved for artists that partner and promote directly through the site. In addition to being the first thing visitors see, they get a blurb summarizing their event along with a button that users can click to browse tickets for that event. Also, either in place of or addition to their usual landing page, they get a custom designed spread as seen in this example here with Jorja Smith.
Similarly, Swift Tix would ideally partner with players in the festival circuit as well. Most of these festivals don’t have much of a say in how their tickets are sold on third party vendors, so working with them directly to create custom landing pages that reflect their brand would help them cater more to their demographics. The top half will always be a information section that doesn’t really vary much, so the bottom half is where the collaboration really begins.
I wanted to showcase how the look, concept, and involvement might vary from event to event. For example, Rolling Loud features more color & interactivity with those clickable blocks than Made in America, who opted for something more slick and simple. You can visit these landing pages along with a few others from the FESTIVALS page. Functionally, they share design language that reminds the user they are browsing Swift Tix, but the rest of each page's aesthetic is indelibly tied to that event's brand.
If this site became a reality, there will need to be a core part of the team that focuses solely on the aesthetics. Other ticket sales websites are unabashedly ecommerce apparatuses, but Swift Tix was created with the understanding that music fans are already looking to make a purchase, so if you focus more on the environment you provide them rather than their pockets, they’ll be more eager to provide you with business again and again.

User Interface

The first guiding principle mentioned above was immersion because the platforms of Swift Tix's competitors echoed none of the passion or excitement that is associated with live events, especially concerts. To stand out among the crowd of ticket sales platforms, the user interface was designed to feel warmer, friendlier, and more reflective of its overall purpose: to help the user form another amazing memory from attending a music event they find on the site.

Shapes and Icons: Soft shapes like circles and rounded rectangles were used for buttons, image borders, controls, and interactive components. Quickly identifiable and rounded icons were preferred for the menus, genres, and recurring elements like reviews and artist page controls.

Note that these icons aren't all of the same set or style - from an initial glance, they seem vastly different but through careful distribution they all succeed in establishing the tone of their associated website area:
GENRE
Playful and colorful
MENU
Flat and straight edge, direct
SITE POLICIES
Scratchy & evocative
REVIEWS
Simple, denotes certain action
Fonts: Multiple fonts of various styles - fun, sans serif, monospaced, etc. - signal different categories of information and calls to action. For example, "Titan One" is only used on buttons, while "Vast Shadow" is used to emphasize important contextual information and switches within a page or overlay. These are all the fonts used along with their semantic meanings:
Colors: In general different shades of French Vanilla, gold, and brown were used to create comfort, be easy on the eyes, and disappear when serving as the backdrop to more vibrant colorful elements, images, or controls. Conversely to achieve this end, harsh colors like black and white, along with typical marketplace colors like green and blue were avoided. Black is only used to denote that the user has "stepped out" of the main site, like with overlays as well as all account related settings and information.

All ARTIST pages are given a distinct light background color to symbolize how each artist is unique - their artist images are chosen to carefully complement these colors as well. The following colors were chosen for the 12 available sample artist pages:
The 4 ticket types all have different colors as well:
And finally, the last major use of color was for the ratings that accompany every ticket:
Interactivity: The various components throughout the site are what give it life and make it feel alive. To appeal to the sentiments of music fans, a design team would create different themes and types of stylized interactive controls that are capable and unobtrusive. This doesn't mean they need to be subtle, only that they fit within the design language, do not distract the user, and do not impede their core function.

Here are a few cool examples:

MARQUEE component - highlights different artists with a brand image, blurb, and button to their special artist page


ALL GENRES component - uses bubbly icons for each genre that refresh the section below with available artists near the user, if there are any


FESTIVALS component - jumbotron that highlights the biggest festival partners with explorative previews of performing artists


ABOUT US page - really play up the musical inspiration and use nice, vivid instrument art for user to discover the points of difference for the platform

Mobile Design: The mobile interface was designed to make the most of the limited screen size of a mobile device. The main approach here was trying to logically condense as much core information for each part of the website as possible into a single screen, allowing the user to easily traverse from one area of the site to another by simply swiping around.

Additionally, the creative spark was carried through as faithfully as possible. Smooth, bouncy animations clearly indicate the contextual shift per swipe, and content has been rearranged and resized to responsively adapt to the proportions of a mobile screen. However, this doesn't mean all components look and behave as shown above - especially because the mobile prototype created only has enough functionality to complete the buyer flow.

The framerate is a little wonky because these are GIFs but you should get the basic idea. Feel free to play around with the actual prototype to see for yourself.

General Navigation (Mobile)


Buyer Flow (Mobile)

A11y Considerations

Handy number based navigation system on all pages. 1 always takes you to the top, 0 always takes you to the bottom, and any page sections in between are distributed as needed from 2-9.

Fixed position back button on all pages except the home page so users can always retrace their steps no sweat.

Unobtrusive back-to-top is available on all pages so that if a user moves their cursor or finger and holds it near the very top of their device’s screen, they will be smoothly taken back to the start of the page.

Responsively expanding to fill space means regardless of the device users browse on, Swift Tix has been designed so that fonts, images, seating charts, buttons, and other controls all scale properly to the available device dimensions so that everything stays easy to read and discern and the immersive environment never falters.

Swipe based mobile navigation to limit scrolling and clearly signify the semantic weight and meaning per screen. The mobile websites of Ticketmaster and Stubhub suffered from trying to downscale and cram their desktop design into a tiny cellphone, especially with the seat selection screen. Here pages have been resized accordingly, pop-ups have been strictly avoided, and the need to zoom has been minimized.

Sticker Sheet

You can see all the assets and controls I used to create this mockup below. All venue schematics, artist images, and festival/tour brand images were pulled from Google:
-5-
USABILITY
STUDY
You can view the raw notes taken in this study here.

STUDY DETAILS

Participants were music fans who go to or wish to attend lots of concerts. This will best resemble the target audience for the app.

  • Time: 20 minutes
  • Number of Participants:  5
  • Place:  United States (Remote)
  • Type:  Unmoderated usability study

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

  • How comfortable does the user feel browsing the site?
  • Does the creativity ever disrupt the user flow or informational content?
  • What’s the likeliness of the user returning to this site for their next ticket purchase instead of another service?
AFFINITY MAP
NOTABLE QUOTES
THEMES AND INSIGHTS
1 out of 5 participants mentioned how the site felt too “big” at times
INSIGHT:  Despite this being only 1 participant, it is a very crucial P0 task because this could also be an accessibility nightmare. Creating an immersive experience is good but at the end of the day people are coming for commerce so navigation needs to still feel quick and snappy
5 out of 5 participants were strongly affected by the design and aesthetic choices, however some did express concerns about how this would affect practical, daily usage
INSIGHT:  Need to keep iterating to achieve a balance between creativity, ingenuity, and utility. Also if the design should be spruced up or changed, the core user flow should remain unaffected and unhindered
3 out of 5 participants expressed policy questions and were unclear on certain core offerings like presale and order support
INSIGHT:  Add more topics to FAQ, condense buying and selling info into a single section, and provide supplemental info on all pages wherever possible
3 out of 5 participants mentioned how fees being included in the prices was a good choice
INSIGHT:  Users like the transparency of the clear breakdown of fees and prices as well as precalculating what you’ll actually pay so you aren’t blindsided later
5 out of 5 participants admired the different interactive components, but some expressed a desire to be more hands on
INSIGHT:  These proof of concept components are what a design team may create for a particular theme, so it’s good they resonated. Need to increase utility though.
4 out of 5 participants loved how the artists were represented across the website
INSIGHT:  Continue creating distinct vibes for each artist on the website, personality is important
DESIGN ADJUSTMENTS
Click on any of the below images to enlarge if needed.
Added the ability to directly join an artist’s STAN program through their page instead of only being able to do it through the settings screen. The FAQ has more info on the program if you’re interested.
Added prices next to the other concert information when selecting a show.
Added website and social media links for featured festivals accessible directly from each of their pages
Replaced price slider with custom price range input fields
Added the artist’s website and streaming links to their bio dialog.
Added an alerts option to alert you when prices dip below a certain threshold, aside from the generic on/off.
Added an alerts option to alert you when prices dip below a certain threshold, aside from the generic on/off.
Added prices next to the other concert information when selecting a show.
Added website and social media links for featured festivals accessible directly from each of their pages
Replaced price slider with custom price range input fields
Added the artist’s website and streaming links to their bio dialog.
Added an alerts option to alert you when prices dip below a certain threshold, aside from the generic on/off.
Added an alerts option to alert you when prices dip below a certain threshold, aside from the generic on/off.
Condensed all buying and selling information into a single easily digestible section. More details and specifics are available directly below for users who want arbitrary details
*Also, a number based navigation system was added on long pages like the home page, where each number would take you to the next page section. A caveat is that this is only available on desktop, but this is made up for by the screen and swipe based mobile navigation.
-6-
ASSORTED FINAL MOCKUPS
Click to view any mockup at full size, or download all screens and frames here (desktop) or here (mobile).
Macbook Pro 16"
iPhone 13 Pro
HOME
FOOTER
SETTINGS
MARQUEE
SEARCH
ABOUT US
RECOMMENDED
FESTIVALS
PRE-SALE
ALL GENRES
SEARCH PAGE
ARTIST PAGE
SHOW SELECTION
FILTERS
BUDGET
TICKETS
SEAT SELECT
CHECKOUT
ORDER PLACED
MY TIX WALLET
-7-
CONCLUSION

NEXT STEPS

  • Allow users to link their streaming services of choice so their concert recommendations can be fine tuned and they can accumulate points when they stream artists they STAN.
  • Verify that the FAQ has relevant responses to all of the users’ most urgent and popular questions, especially when conducting further usability studies.
  • Begin iterating the ticket listing creation user flow as the current prototype centers on the purchase user flow.
  • Add swiping from screen to screen for navigation on desktop for newer touchscreen laptops and tablet devices
  • Comprise and develop a public list of ticketing partners to let users know which venues and locations are available for them to directly purchase from.
  • Verify that industry A11y standards have been met once prototyping and testing are complete to provide a full experience for A11y users.

COMPETITIVE POINTS OF DIFFERENCE

  • Redefine Platinum tickets, which are currently dynamically priced tickets that fluctuate based on demand but are a key tool used by scalpers. At Swift Tix, Platinum tickets takes on a new meaning that actually supports its name - tickets that unequivocally will include something additional to the show itself like parking passes, early entry, merch discounts, etc. This applies to both human sellers AND venues - venues can create their own Platinum Tickets to sell venue-specific add ons and keep the extra profits! This helps support different concert venues and keeps music culture alive.
  • All ticket listings are authenticated in order to bring extra comfort to the user's mind. Only tickets purchased on the website may be sold on it, meaning the tickets are always in buyer possession and there is no selling in advance if you do not have a ticket presently. A digital lock also obfuscates the ticket barcode until 1 hour before the show, which hampers counterfeiting.
  • Responsive customer support. No excuse to treat customers who are already eager to buy your product poorly if things to wrong. This includes promptly following refund policies, returning any incoming communication in a timely manner, and sticking by any buyer or seller protections and insurance policies.
  • Flat 5% service fee. Swift Tix takes a flat 5% cut of every ticket sale. That's it. Every time, unless there is a transaction with unfair margins based on the mean market price for a certain event.
  • Clear, buyer friendly price rating system to keep all buyers aware of deals they need to pounce on and deal they need to avoid. This also lets sellers know how to adjust their prices. Color semantically conveys urgency as well.
  • An unwavering commitment to the aesthetics. More iteration will be required to fine tune the specifics, but crafting a creative design that does not impede the main user flows has paid off and is a great way to resonate with fans and have them coming back to the site. Bespoke artist pages and interactive but informative components enrich the overall user experience here.
  • No bots welcome. Fighting scalping was the main reason Swift Tix was created, and this is a responsibility that is taken seriously. Closely monitoring traffic, placing temporary holds to review transactions, and requiring two-factor authentication during the first 12 hours of public onsale are just some of the ways that Swift Tix aims to curb the impact of bots on fan sales. The most important is the no tolerance, one strike policy, where any connection identified as a bot or scalper is permanently banned.
  • Reward real fans with the STAN system. As an incentive to keep devout music fans coming back, the STAN system is a special means of directly giving back to your favorite artists and receiving cool exclusive benefits in return. The program and its benefits are controlled by each artist and their team, and Swift Tix takes no cut of any money you give. Many more specifics are available in the FAQ section.
  • Buyers never pay more than the average price of a ticket. The first thing listed under the Buying & Selling section, and arguably the most important buyer protection. Let's say Bob sells Alice a ticket for $60 when the average price is $45. Assuming Bob bought the ticket originally for $30, instead of profiting 100% Bob would only profit 67% because of extra fees meant to curb excessive margins. Alice, as the buyer, simply pays $45 regardless.

WHAT I LEARNED

This was my first time designing a modern website, and it was pretty apparent early on that this would be a much more exhaustive & meticulous process than my first UX project. Translating the visual ideas I imagined into interactive design elements allowed me to master creating, using, and maintaining component variant sets in Figma. As things progressed, I also learned the value of organizing all these component sets & keeping my project neat overall.

One particular challenge was implementing dynamically sized sections like the FAQ or Coachella Passes section, which I was able to solve by learning how to use Figma’s Auto Layouts. I had a lot of fun experimenting heavily with the different animation types, curves, and times available to make sure the website had no jarring transitions- working on the navigation of the mobile mockups especially taught me how to cleverly use Figma’s wonderful smart animations.

To make this website stand out, I wanted to take a fair share of creative risks, but I made sure that the user and their convenience remained the focal point of all my design decisions- otherwise it would just be a glorified art project. I’m happy with the balance I’ve found here with providing a user experience that is both inventive and effective.

ALL DOWNLOADS

THE END

THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME TO REVIEW MY WORK!

I BET WE CAN MAKE SOMETHING EVEN COOLER :)
Return To Home Screen